Vernaculiar: The pecuLIARity of the everyday - a manifesto based on Tom Sherman’s excerpts of Vernacular Video.

Vernaculiar to download
the other POV

Being a perfectionist had always been a piece hidden at the most beneath of my inner being. It takes up a lot of self-detriments, sacrifices, disappointments, and dissatisfaction – not at all a good characteristic to pick up in life. An apparent example would be this late delivery of the manifesto. It had a solid structure by time it was to be due, but flaws keep appearing one after another, not to mention the faults we found through software, conditions of facilities use and also the race with time.
Rendy, a fellow tutorial mate and I decided to integrate our final projects, based from the course name of Integrated Media. It was time consuming to put our ideas together and put the differences away. We decided to make an example our manifesto through a cinematic approach. It was pretty interesting now that I browse through this batch’s students manifestos and find how most of them used videos as a medium of evidencing their propositions in a theoretical way. What I’m trying to get at is as I watch Rendy’s and my videos and try to reflect through comparing, it is totally different in a sense; we are making a vernacular video based on of our propositions!
Our differences lie on the most basic grounds of our propositions. Rendy’s propositon was more towards the allowance of viewer’s interactivity and cinematic online approach whilst mine was pretty much to improve the reputation of the vernacular art through proper cinematic approach.
It was quite a disaster during the start, while working in a group allows more ideas; but as more ideas follows, more conflicts came about as well. The more time consuming part was the scripting – believe it or not – we had 3 quite a formed story and bits and pieces of developable ideas. We settled down at what is in our manifesto, with two similar propositions where we are to disregard narrative and its elements as a priority but have multiple sequences that bears meanings within themselves yet are still able to contextualize each other well and keep viewers close.
The MOST time consuming part lied in editing (filming is just a hair below it), we locked ourselves in edit suite 1 and 2 for a week, working from noon till after hours, where we had no appropriate access. (getting kicked out is one, leaving with alarm blaring behind us is another, holding our pee in is the worst, really, then the worse when it gets to having to crash at a friend’s place for the whole week just because she lives stone throw to uni!) it was a challenge to share a similar material and make it into 2 different manifestos that hold similar meaning yet different in a way. Speaking of 2 different things, we did the film in 2 different ways each (2 storylines) to give choices to a viewer to take from. This is Rendy’s way to justify interactivity and on my part, is to add up appeal for my viewers content and aesthetic wise, having different songs to it. The navigation was a five letter swearword. I wanted my viewers to be able to have choices to read all the propositions in their own way, reviewing it by pressing next or back, or by choosing through the numbers. The videos I made a page where they can choose the storyline on how they’d want the story to end.
While editing, we met a fellow mate, Damien, who wished us luck and hinted that the worst part was to come by saying “I really want to track down the guy who made eZedia and kill him”. Well, that was very true. We moved to Bonza and started our exploration of eZedia which really is the worst part of the project. Not mentioning the after hours restriction, eZedia kept crashing on us which after a night in Bonza, we snapped and just went home in the late night. I decided to purchase eZedia and worked from outside restriction hours.
It was crazily crashing (still) and really, seriously, time consuming. One of them buggers were the links I tried to make in every single proposition page existent that links to each other, the effects, the photoshopping of images down to the right size. Oh just please, everyone would understand how this feels, after all we went through, won’t we?
Overall, I think we did a reasonably satisfactory work, I’ve tried to convey my propositions in my videos, content is significant, but aesthetics is a hair below it. I call my manifesto ‘Vernaculiar’ to achieve what I have in mind for the piece. Peculiarity is intriguing. Peculiarity in the everyday could relate to everyone and doing it in a proper cinematic way scales down the amateurish reputation of the vernacular art. It could have been done better, eZedia tones down the color of the video a little bit, which is a regret of mine. I wish I had more time (we all do, but I’m first on the line!)
It is satisfactory, but not satisfying, just relieving. We are definitely going back to edit a better version of our manifesto within the semester break because we are priviliged to keep the suite keys over the break being such a faithful regular! But for now, I hope the product conveys my perspective of the excerpts of Tom Sherman’s Vernacular Video clearly!
[From Vernaculiar: the manifesto of the pecuLIARity of the everyday]